Friday, 11 May 2012 13:25
administrator
I recently had the experience of going to Sacramento to meet with lawmakers on some key legislation of interest to the Catholic bishops. To be clear, I vote but otherwise do not get very political. I also do not associate with bishops and would never normally do such a thing, especially because while I agree with all the Catholic Church teaches, I do not accept that I must therefore be a Democrat. Why did I do it? Because I have to go outside my comfort zone, and because I believe the legislation we were going to promote was right in the light of our faith. So I went, but what did I find?
I met with two assemblymen, and the aides to two Senators. One Democrat, three Republican (these were my assignments, not choices). I found the Democrat uninteresting and unopen. There was no discussion, he simply stated his positions and told us to "have the priests tell people they need to pay more taxes." It is the Republicans that interested me.
Most of the bills were for the poor or prisoners. Compassionate release for prisoners with terminal illnesses, making it possible for youth released from detention to be mainstreamed into public schools (if not a danger), removing restrictions on vehicle worth for those in work programs, and a few others. These were things that would generally save modest amounts of money, reduce government, and make life better for a few people in a few cases. Nothing earth shattering. I felt the legislators listened, and got the message, but were afraid to damage their brand. These were (mostly) bills that they could have reached out to Democrats on (I would have) and said, "this is a no-brainer, it is obviously the right thing to do, and I am not afraid to agree with you."
Another Republican senator, with whom I did not meet, was reported to have said, "you Catholics come here and ask for support, but then your bishops support the Democrats." Many of my fellow "lobbyists" were young Catholics, 18 - 23, and they got it. But the older ones dismissed this senator as unfair, even after the Mandate. They are stuck as Democrats and cannot let go. The Republicans are stuck in their own brand and cannot let go. And they cannot work together. If there is to be cooperation across the aisles, at a time when America needs it most, perhaps it needs to come from the young Catholics I met, who only care passionately about the issues, not their identities as Democrats or Republicans.
And will there ever be a candidate they can support?
Last Updated on Friday, 11 May 2012 13:45
Sunday, 08 April 2012 17:08
administrator
Question received today:
What is the most fundamental tenet of Christianity? Is it self salvation or service to others?
Our answer:
From a Catholic perspective, we would probably say the fundamental tenet of Christianity is Love. God is Love, so to truly Love is to embrace God. One cannot be close to God and not saved, and one cannot be close to God without being of service to others. Everything good comes from God; everything good comes from Love.
According to Frank Sheed, a great Catholic writer, we believe we are saved in community, so the two options, self salvation and service to others (the two greatest commandments), are inseparable.
John Donne's Meditation 17 reflects this as well. We are together in this life.
When we look for a rule-based religion, we miss the point. Rules are simple and absolve us of the need to think, and they remove the need to truly love others. If God had wanted us to be fundamentally about rules, Jesus need not have lived among us, suffered, died, and rose. In the readings during the day today, we see Peter and John hurrying to the empty tomb, but John outran Peter. Once again, the last shall be first. John followed the rules, and did not enter the tomb. It would have made him unclean, and it was against the rules. When Peter arrived, he rushed in, as Love drove him to do. When John saw this, he entered, and believed.
The fundmental tenet of Christianity is Love. If we miss that, none of the rest matters.
|
Sunday, 19 February 2012 12:36
administrator
In the book, How to Read Literature Like a Professor, the author points out the literary meanings behind seasons, weather, and character descriptions. Today’s Gospel, the healing of the paralytic lowered from the roof, has several interesting points worth noting. The most obvious, and perhaps most often remarked, is that Jesus forgives sins, which shocks the religious leaders, but then heals the paralytic as proof of his authority. Christians already depend upon and embrace the healing and forgiveness offered by Jesus, but what else can we learn here?
Other aspects of this story are significant for our own situation. There are four men who bring the paralytic to Jesus, but are blocked by the crowd. Who are these men, or whom do they represent, and why are there four (aside from practical concerns)? The number four often represents the whole world, so perhaps it reminds us that the whole world comes to Christ for healing and forgiveness. We know nothing of their motivations. These litter bearers are not described as friends or relatives. For all we know, they may have been servants or even paid to deliver the paralytic, perhaps by his mother. We do know they were highly motivated, and considered getting the man to Jesus as more important than a roof. Seeing this, Jesus did not comment on the faith of the paralytic, but on the faith of those who bore the man in need of saving, and this was enough.
The heresy of Pelagianism claimed that we can attain Heaven by our own efforts. One objection to infant baptism has been the lack of choice, and that the child should wait until they can choose on their own. But in today’s story, it is the faith of the bearers that matters, the paralytic never requests healing or forgiveness. In the gospels, Jesus sometimes takes the initiative and heals those who did not ask, or invites himself to a tax collector’s house, when all the man wanted was to see Jesus. This turns our sense of control upside down, as we want to be the prime mover. We decide when we will accept Christ or reform our lives. But it is God who calls first, and we can only choose to answer.
In this gospel story, the paralytic is presented before Jesus, and he both forgives and heals. When Jesus commands him to get up and walk, he does so. While God moves first, it is up to us to move next. He will forgive and heal, but we must carry on from there.
Last Updated on Sunday, 19 February 2012 23:42
Monday, 10 October 2011 22:48
Ed
The necessity of infant baptism
Ask a question about why Catholics baptize babies and the response is often “in case they die.” Leaving aside the questions about the fate of unbaptized children for now (CCC 1261), this is a fundamentally flawed answer for a number of reasons. The truth is, we baptize babies (and anyone else) in case they live. Baptism initiates the sacramental life, provides visible assurance of God’s Grace, and marks the person as a worthy recipient of all God has to offer. This worthiness does not come from the person, but from God, and infant baptism underscores the fact that God initiates the saving action. We are all as helpless as infants when it comes to bringing about our own salvation, but this is most obvious in an infant. Just as we expect a child to be washed and presentable before sitting down to an elegant dinner with us, God cleanses us and makes us worthy to sit at His table. The sooner we are cleansed, the sooner we can enjoy God’s company at table. Baptism is also a visible assurance of God’s Grace, provided we believe Christ’s own words. There is no need for the baptized child to question later, “was I baptized?” There is even a certificate. With the assurance that the event happened, and that it means a promise of Grace, the child can grow in confidence, with no doubt of God’s love and support. Even in sin, there is the confidence that repentance will be met with mercy, and that where there is no repentance, God will continue to call and look for the return of the prodigal. A baptized person need never doubt God’s love. Neither does anyone else, as God loves all, but the baptized person has received proof. Baptism is also a visible sign that the child deserves all the Church has to offer. The parents are bound by Baptism to treat their child as their beloved brother or sister, not just a child, and certainly not chattel. With some sensible restrictions, the Church cannot rightfully refuse to minister to that child, so Baptism brings an obligation to all baptized others, including the saints. The child is baptized priest, prophet and king, to become part of the Body of Christ, no less than anyone else, and with this in mind, how could any parent not desire it?
For further reading: http://old.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2.shtml#art1
Last Updated on Monday, 10 October 2011 22:57
Friday, 29 April 2011 14:48
administrator
Here is a response to our list of the Seven Deadly Sins from bigstahl500 (emphasis mine):
"pribe is not a one of 7. It is envy. Pride is a virtue. One takes pride in life, career,children and anything that keeps the human race moving . Do you take pride in this web site? Or is that a deadly sin? Envy, not pride. way to go whith being stupid...Miss Quote more...Top 3 Google sites wow ignorens is bliss.."
We hardly know where to begin, but we can definitely point to this as an example of what the country, if not civilization, is coming to. It is so sad, and this person clearly has no clue to their own ignorance. It would be fine if they simply disagreed with Pope St. Gregory the Great, but they actually believe every site that includes Pride as one of the Seven Deadly Sins is misquoting (Miss Quoting?) the source (Gregory's Moralia in Job). Oh well.
To see the original site: The Seven Deadly Sins
Last Updated on Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:09
Sunday, 24 April 2011 15:02
administrator
Question:
If Jesus is the one and only way to the father, why hasent the whole world embraced Him? Why do we have various other religions? -- from 'M'
Our Answer:
Ever since Adam, the whole world has hidden from God. We hide behind the many religions we have invented, we hide behind the masks we wear and the masks we put on God. We hide from God because we sin and because we want to go on sinning, and because we are ashamed of all this. At the same time, we desire God, so we try to find some middle ground where we can feel righteous but not get too close to God. When Jesus brought the world too close to the Father, the world put him to death, hoping to gain some distance, but instead it broke Heaven open and Grace poured out on everyone, making it even harder to hide God from ourselves.
Hiding from God is more difficult than ever, but at the end of the world, it will be impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |